Healthcare Intelligence Network
Accountable Care Organizations
Best Sellers
Behavioral Healthcare
Bundled Payment
Care Coordination
Care Transitions
Case Management
Chronic Care Management
Coming Soon
Community Health
Cultural Diversity
Data Analytics
Diabetes Management
Disease Management
Dual Eligibles
Emergency Medicine
Health Literacy
Health Risk Assessments
Health Risk Stratification
Healthcare Reform
Healthcare Trends
HIN Benchmark Reports
HIN Case Studies
Home Health
Home Visits
Hospital Readmissions
Infection Control
Information Technology
Long-Term Care
Managed Care
Medical Home
Medical Neighborhood
Medical Practice
Medical Records
Medication Adherence
Nurse Management
Palliative Care
Patient Engagement
Patient Experience
Patient Registry
Pay for Performance
Physician Practice Transformation
Physician Organizations
Physician Quality Reporting Initiative
Population Health Management
Post-Acute Care
Predictive Modeling
Quality Improvement
Remote Patient Monitoring
Revenue Cycle Management
Social Health Determinants
Training DVDs
Value-Based Reimbursement
What's New
Subscribe to the Free
'Healthcare Business Weekly Update' e-Newsletter and receive the latest trends, news and analysis in healthcare.

Click here to view this week's issue
Home > Hospital
Safeguarding Peer Review Immunity & Document Confidentiality: Crafting Policies and Procedures to Limit Exposure Implications and Impact on the March 27 Poliner Ruling
Safeguarding Peer Review Immunity & Document Confidentiality: Crafting Policies and Procedures to Limit Exposure Implications and Impact on the March 27 Poliner Ruling
Safeguarding Peer Review Immunity & Document Confidentiality: Crafting Policies and Procedures to Limit Exposure Implications and Impact on the March 27 Poliner Ruling
Be the first to review this item
Your Price:
Add to Wish List

Peer review works best for providers when the proceedings are confidential -- physicians and other staff can focus on a physician's performance, without concern for civil liability. However, even statutory privileges granted peer review proceedings aren't ironclad. Loopholes abound, and hospitals make mistakes that cost them the protection.

In the case of Dr. Lawrence Poliner, documents and evidence from his peer review proceedings were presented to the jury. The jury concluded that the hospital and physicians involved in suspending his clinical privileges acted in bad faith and with malice. The jury awarded him over $366 million in damages -- including $110 million in exemplary damages.

On March 27, 2006, the federal district court held Poliner could not receive double recovery for the same injury, which the jury had awarded-- and sent the matter to mediation for a determination of damages.

Listen as our authoritative panelists examine the steps that hospitals and their counsel can take to bolster peer review immunity and shield related documents from discovery -- and the implications and impact of the district court's most recent decision in the Poliner case.

Mark A. Kadzielski, Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, Los Angeles, represents hospitals and health care providers throughout the U.S in a variety of matters, including peer review, government regulatory investigations, contracting issues, and credentialing.

Adrienne E. Marting, Partner, Powell Goldstein, Atlanta, concentrates in healthcare law and litigation. She represents hospitals, home health agencies, managed care entities, and other healthcare facilities and providers before administrative agencies and state and federal courts. She works closely with hospitals and their medical staffs on revising bylaws and related policies as well as peer review investigations and hearings.

The panelists address these and other key questions:

  • Which parties and documents in the peer review process are privileged under HCQIA and relevant state peer review statutes?
  • What factors have led courts to decide that peer review documents are discoverable and professionals involved are not entitled to immunity?
  • What lessons can be learned from court decisions like Poliner?
  • What are some typical weaknesses of peer review statutes that parties exploit when seeking access to information about proceedings?
  • What can healthcare providers do to bolster their claim to peer review immunity?
Publication Date: May 2006
Browse Similar Items
Physician Organizations

2017 Healthcare Benchmarks: Case Management
3 Embedded Care Coordination Models to Manage Diverse High-Risk, High-Cost Patients Across the Continuum
A New Vision for Remote Patient Monitoring: Creating Sustainable Financial, Operational and Clinical Outcomes
Profiting from Population Health Revenue in an ACO: Framework for Medicare Shared Savings and MIPS Success

Copyright Healthcare Intelligence Network. All Rights Reserved. eCommerce Software by 3dcart.